Skip to main content

Evil is as Evil Does

What is evil? What is the nature of evil?

My first impulse was to say "I may not be able to define it, but I know it when I see it." But I realized that's a cop out.

So let's say Lawrence Krause is right and the universe is a spontaneous creation from nothing. Before consciousness evolves, can evil even exist? I don't think so. If an asteroid crashes into a planet, it's just following its trajectory. If there was no life on the planet, the needle on the Evil-O-Meter(TM) doesn't even twitch. If there was life, and the asteroid's impact killed it all, still no evil. After all, the asteroid was a rock whose trajectory had been determined eons before. It was just a chance meeting in space.

So clearly evil requires life, consciousness, and intent.

Let us stipulate for the purposes of argument that God doesn't exist. Because then we avoid The Big Cop Out. I think a good place to start from here is the intentional infliction of suffering on another. A surgeon does that, but we don't label that as evil because it's an attempt to help. How about war? That is suffering on the grand scale. But is it evil? What if it's two tribes arguing over water rights and it's not clear which is the aggressor or which is "right" or "wrong"?

How about torture. Clearly that's evil, right? But I'm reading Steven Pinker's book right now, "The Angels of our Better Nature", and he describes the gruesome tortures of times past being gleefully relished public spectacles. Clearly the consensus at that time was not that torture is evil. They were inured to it.

Putting a hardened, vicious criminal into solitary confinement is not evil. But that same person, years before, a shy and sweet little boy, we definitely would protest tossing him into chokey like that. Was the man evil? Why not the boy?

What if his warped, deranged, abusive father was entirely responsible for slowly turning the sweet little boy into a vicious killer through cruel treatment, deliberate indoctrination and brain washing? Do you still think the man thrown into solitary was evil? What if, without the brain washing, he would have grown up to make Mother Teresa and Albert Schweitzer look like a couple of selfish, wanton reprobates? How about the abusive father? Was he evil? Can you even make that judgment without knowing his back story?

How about Miss Havisham from Great Expectations? As a revenge against humanity for being callously abandoned at the alter by her dastardly suitor, she adopts an orphan girl and raises her in luxury to grow up to be a cold beauty who can break men's hearts right and left. Miss Havisham was kind to Estella, fawned over her, gave her everything, and raised her to hate men and break their hearts mercilessly. Was Miss Havisham evil? How about the cold and cruel Estella?

What about Nazi soldiers, after spending the day gassing Jews, returning home to a wife and children and lavishing affection on them? Is Fritz evil? He's raising happy, well-adjusted children who will grow up to decry the treatment the previous generation had inflicted on the Jews. Does that compensate for his actions as a soldier?

So after all those hypothetical scenarios, what is evil? Is it the intentional, malicious infliction of harm on an innocent, undeserving person or people? Do we say that actions are evil, but not people? Where does free will enter into this? Why is it, when we know all the facts the picture so often becomes not more, but less clear? Is it valid to retroactively apply our standards on the actions of those that came before us and call their actions evil when they themselves clearly had no evil intent? Are we just a bunch of wishy-washy relativists, hopelessly enmired in our liberal western worldview and unable to tell right from wrong? Does that make us evil other than to conservatives?

This is a quandary for a person who wants to be as unevil as possible. I guess the lessons are: don't be too quick to judge others; things are not always what they seem, so dig deeper; and context is important in determining good and evil.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Important lessons from the Russo-Ukrainian War

My attention for the last few months has been very much occupied by Vladimir Putin's war on the Ukraine. Like many, I have come to feel a deep admiration for the bravery, resource, intelligence and dogged persistence of the Ukrainian people and military in the defense of their country. It has also been extremely gratifying to see European nations put aside their internal differences and full-heartedly support the Ukraine in their hour of need. I have also been struck by the contrast between what we have traditionally thought of Russia's military power and what we are actually seeing unfold in front of our eyes today -- over a million casualties in a war that was intended to last at most a few weeks, but has dragged out over more than four years with no end in sight. We are seeing the hardware of war being destroyed in colossal numbers by drone warfare -- tanks and artillery vehicles in their thousands, entire air defense systems wiped out, even the flagship of the Russian navy,...

To Boldly Split Infinitives

This is somewhat a manifesto. English is not Latin. We can put prepositions at the end of a sentence if we want to. And we can start sentences with a conjunction! If we want to boldly split infinitives, then we're perfectly welcome to do so. Why? Because these are all syntactically correct constructs in English; they parse. And even more, they convey meaning to other speakers of the language, which is the real test of whether something is permitted in a language. My seventh grade English teacher, Mrs. Doane, a throwback to the 19th century prescriptivist grammarians, would no doubt sniff disapprovingly and peer with narrowed eyes over her Far Side-style glasses at such goings on. However, now I have the M.A. in Linguistics and can scowl back with gravitas. And so I will echo those marvelous Churchillian words: " This is the type of arrant pedantry up with which I will not put. " But in the end, I must confess that it was Guy Deutscher who freed me from the pointless tyran...

The North-going Zax and the South-going Zax

Yesterday, I was on my lunch time walk and had an interesting experience. It lasted perhaps less than 2 seconds and yet I've been thinking about it on and off ever since. I was trundling along at my usual brisk pace, on the right-hand side of the path. A few yards off, I spied a man walking toward me on my side of the sidewalk, two trains heading toward each other on the same track. As we grew closer, I instinctively hugged the right-hand margin a little closer and he did the same. When it became clear that we were on a collision course, the image of the old Dr. Seuss story about the North-going Zax and the South-going Zax popped into my head. In the story, the two Zaxes meet and stand there for years, each too stubborn to give way to the other, while a city grows up around them. For about a quarter of a second, I contemplated such a pissing contest and realized that such a course of action did not advance my goal of getting back to work in time for my 2:00 meeting. So I swerve...