Skip to main content

E pluribus unum

The original motto of the United States, e pluribus unum -- from many, one -- originally signified the inclusion of 13 separate colonies into one body politic. But it also came to represent the notion that you can come to this country and become a participating citizen, taking on the responsibilities and reaping the benefits.

In the 1950s, in response to severe threats playing out on the world stage, we adopted a new motto, In God We Trust. In many ways, this motto's intentions were similar to those of the original -- to unite us around a common purpose in order to prevail against forces seeking to destroy us.

It was an understandable but risky choice to adopt the new motto. And now the full extent of that risk is becoming clearer every day. The trends we can see developing around us are making it more obvious than ever that we have to quash the terrifying specter of a government that wields the power of religion. 

Power does not respect religion. It only uses it to advance its own ends, destroying both the faith and then eventually itself. And always, always it destroys many lives in the process. 

It all seems harmless enough at first. We are tempted to use the power of religion to attain some cherished political ambitions -- restoring morality or greatness to the nation, or ridding us of some terrible "evil." But in the very next breath after we yield up that power, or even in the same breath, we invariably start to observe it being misused for terrible purposes. Banning books, enacting restrictions on people who don't look or think, like "us", and using the law to impose the will of some on others -- these phenomena appear, as we have seen, instantaneously. And it only goes downhill from there. The people who clamored to put the power of religion into the hands of the government soon find it being used as a weapon. And then, once that power is dug in, they find that they themselves are never more than a single election away from having that weapon pointed at them. Or if they succeed in undermining the electoral process or the Rule of Law, there is no barrier at all between them and the capricious will of any demagogue who manages to grab onto power.

When engineering our government, the founders were intensely, acutely aware of this risk, and they went to extraordinary lengths to try to prevent this terrible outcome from occurring. Let us not be the generation known for heedlessly throwing away our government "of the people, by the people, for the people."

Let us instead be known as the generation who saved the nation by restoring our original motto -- from many, one. It is well for some people that they derive a benefit from trusting in their chosen deity. But we must also Never Forget those twin towers in New York City. Their destruction was the direct result of a trust in God -- a trust that was usurped by political ambition and turned into a weapon of mass destruction.

Bad outcomes like that WILL happen to us if we continue down the terrible path that demagogues are trying to entice us into entering. They are following the Demagoguery 101 playbook to the letter, playing on our fear of change, fear of loss, and fear of others who don't look like us. They grab at this power, not for our benefit, but only to gain power for themselves.

All you who approve of what we have seen in many state legislatures and in the Supreme Court this year to force the morality, the beliefs, and the prejudices of the majority on other people, turn back now before it's too late. You are selling our birthright of liberty for a mess of culture war pottage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Comments on Paradox: On Ownership

It's funny, but not not surprising, that we seem to have had some similar life experiences. The notion of ownership has been very transformative in my life, too. I can clearly recall several instances of what some might call an epiphany, where I experienced an overwhelming realization of ownership. These instances were all similar -- a sudden certainty, like a light turning on, that I was in the right place at the right time doing the right thing for the right reasons; and the not-unpleasant sensation of a new weight of responsibility settling on my shoulders, a weight I was comfortably able to bear. For the longest time, I had no word to describe these experiences, but I have come to view them as taking ownership. These experiences, and the habit of ownership that arose from them, have been very instrumental in any successes I have experienced in my life. Every religion on the planet is probably eager to offer an interpretation of these experiences -- to frame them in the phraseol

Let's talk about freedom

People talk about freedom all the time, but do they ever really think about what it means to be free? Let's take a couple of examples to use as thought experiments. No one should be surprised when my first thought turns to language. Here's too much linguistic freedom in action: Gukb fsilmpmer splifffdd ..;;, !!! @ WASKKQS&&&&^^^^ zzzzmzmzmllllz( If we want to take advantage of language, we have to obey some rules -- a whole lot of them, many layers of rules. In situations where your native language is being spoken, your ear is finely tuned to detect unbelievably minute departures from normal language sounds. You can detect a non-native speaker a mile away from a slightly mispronounced vowel, or even just a missing glottal stop where you would normally expect it. And don't even get me started on grammar. For every way to get something right, there are 100 ways to get it wrong. And yet, once we learn to work within the rules of the language, we experience a mu